Research tools: Difference between revisions
From Sustainable linguistics
Jump to navigationJump to search
(added a category) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This is related to [[Sustainability in linguistics]]. | Some ways to make academic research more sustainable in terms of tools, practices and technology. This is related to [[Sustainability in linguistics]]. | ||
* | * Carbon neutral research - every fieldwork should be justified | ||
* | * Open source software - adding to the transparency of the process | ||
* | * Ethical and responsible handling of sensitive data during documentation (e.g. avoiding using Google docs or similar) | ||
* '' | * ''Being dependent on a tool you do not control is an unsustainable practice'' | ||
[[Category:Linguistic Practices]] | [[Category:Linguistic Practices]] | ||
[[Category:Fieldwork ethics]] | [[Category:Fieldwork ethics]] | ||
[[Category:Technology and linguistic practices]] | [[Category:Technology and linguistic practices]] | ||
Revision as of 14:08, 23 January 2023
Some ways to make academic research more sustainable in terms of tools, practices and technology. This is related to Sustainability in linguistics.
- Carbon neutral research - every fieldwork should be justified
- Open source software - adding to the transparency of the process
- Ethical and responsible handling of sensitive data during documentation (e.g. avoiding using Google docs or similar)
- Being dependent on a tool you do not control is an unsustainable practice
