Talk:Sustainable linguistics (definition): Difference between revisions

From Sustainable linguistics
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
* ‘Sustainable linguistics’ is ambiguous between sustainability of linguistics and the contribution linguistics can make to addressing sustainability issues. There are, however, connections between the two: the way in which we do things in linguistics affects the impact we can have on sustainability issues. Therefore, both questions need to be addressed in conjunction. (take-home message on the slides)
* ‘Sustainable linguistics’ is ambiguous between sustainability of linguistics and the contribution linguistics can make to addressing sustainability issues. There are, however, connections between the two: the way in which we do things in linguistics affects the impact we can have on sustainability issues. Therefore, both questions need to be addressed in conjunction. (take-home message on the slides)
* sustainability should be something that everyone has in mind while working on their own research. Research should be planned and organized with sustainability as a central goal, in whatever form it works for the specific discipline.
* sustainability should be something that everyone has in mind while working on their own research. Research should be planned and organized with sustainability as a central goal, in whatever form it works for the specific discipline.
• As a movement within linguistics
  o To promote sustainability issues relating to the study of language
• As a potential subfield of linguistics
  o Could be complicated/ problematic
  o Potential for isolation
  o Issues of sustainability are inherently interdisciplinary and are related to all fields of science
  o Could promote focus on solutions and increase visibility in sustainable linguistics
• As a branch of sustainability science
  o Broad and interdisciplinary

Revision as of 11:49, 30 November 2022

  • What does “sustainable” mean? This is important for the definition. In the text, the economical aspects are missing (basing on the three pilars of sustainability). Other definition would be “it stays in the future”
  • Sustainable linguistics should not be equated with language endangerment, but the discussion always goes towards that. (e.g. understanding language ecologies)
  • ‘Sustainable linguistics’ is ambiguous between sustainability of linguistics and the contribution linguistics can make to addressing sustainability issues. There are, however, connections between the two: the way in which we do things in linguistics affects the impact we can have on sustainability issues. Therefore, both questions need to be addressed in conjunction. (take-home message on the slides)
  • sustainability should be something that everyone has in mind while working on their own research. Research should be planned and organized with sustainability as a central goal, in whatever form it works for the specific discipline.

• As a movement within linguistics

  o	To promote sustainability issues relating to the study of language

• As a potential subfield of linguistics

  o	Could be complicated/ problematic
  o	Potential for isolation
  o	Issues of sustainability are inherently interdisciplinary and are related to all fields of science
  o	Could promote focus on solutions and increase visibility in sustainable linguistics

• As a branch of sustainability science

  o	Broad and interdisciplinary